Last verified: May 2026
Question 1 of April 2015
In April 2015, Wichita voters approved the Wichita Marijuana Reform Initiative (commonly called Question 1) by a 54-46 margin. The ordinance reduced first-offense possession of small amounts to a $50 fine within Wichita city limits.
Then-Attorney General Derek Schmidt sued, and on January 22, 2016, the Kansas Supreme Court struck the ordinance down on procedural/preemption grounds, holding the city had not properly published the ordinance text and ruling the measure "illegal and void." The court’s opinion is now the leading authority for the broader principle that Kansas city ordinances cannot directly override state criminal statutes. See preemption page.
The May 2017 $50 Presumptive Penalty Replacement
In May 2017, the Wichita City Council unanimously approved a watered-down replacement creating a "presumptive penalty" of $50 plus court costs and lab fees for first-offense possession of less than 32 grams in municipal court — preserving the spirit of Question 1 without directly overriding state law. The presumptive-penalty framework operated within the existing K.S.A. § 21-5706 framework but constrained Wichita Municipal Court charging to a low fine in routine cases.
The September 13, 2022 Ordinance Repeal
On September 13, 2022, the Wichita City Council voted 5-2 to repeal the city’s marijuana possession ordinance entirely (Section 5.26.010) and amend Section 5.26.030 to remove marijuana and fentanyl test strips from the definition of "drug paraphernalia." The vote, championed by then-Mayor Brandon Whipple, did not legalize cannabis — Sedgwick County District Attorney Marc Bennett retained the option to charge cases under state law in district court — but it eliminated city prosecution of an estimated 750–850 possession cases annually.
The Sedgwick County Sheriff and DA Pushback
Sedgwick County Sheriff Jeff Easter and DA Bennett both publicly criticized the ordinance repeal, warning that under state law, deputies could no longer issue tickets and would have to physically book offenders into the Sedgwick County jail. The pushback reflected the structural tension: the ordinance repeal removed the lower-friction city-court charging option, leaving only the higher-friction (and more burdensome to law enforcement) state-court option.
What the 2022 Repeal Means in Practice
- Wichita PD officers no longer charge sub-32-gram possession in city court. They can still charge under state law, but the choice is theirs.
- Sedgwick County sheriff’s deputies retain charging authority under state law — and operate under DA Bennett, who has been cool to the reform.
- Kansas Highway Patrol retains charging authority across all jurisdictions.
- State-court charging requires a physical booking at the county jail, increasing officer time per case — one of the practical reasons routine sub-ounce possession arrests have declined post-repeal.
Why Wichita Voted This Way
Wichita’s libertarian-conservative cultural register — rooted in its aerospace industry (Boeing-spinoff Spirit AeroSystems, Textron Aviation) and Air Capital frontier history — produced a coalition for the 2015 Question 1 vote and, later, the 2022 ordinance repeal. The "leave us alone" ethos of much of the Wichita electorate aligns with cannabis-policy reform in ways that more progressive cities’ reform politics don’t. Question 1 succeeded in a deeply Republican county precisely because its frame was libertarian, not progressive.
Mayor Lily Wu and the Current Posture
Mayor Lily Wu (elected 2023, took office January 2024) has not pursued further cannabis-policy reform. The 2022 ordinance repeal remains in effect; the Wichita Police Department retains discretion to arrest under state law, but cases are no longer prosecuted in Wichita Municipal Court.
Question 1 in the National Context
The Wichita Question 1 vote is notable as one of the earliest U.S. municipal cannabis decriminalization measures to face state-court invalidation. The Kansas Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling has been cited by other state supreme courts considering similar ordinance disputes; it’s a structural reminder that home-rule authority cannot override state criminal statutes through direct conflict.
For in-depth cannabis education, dosing guides, safety information, and research summaries, visit our partner site TryCannabis.org
Related on this site: KCK Marijuana Diversion Program (Oct..., Lawrence Loophole, Send a Message.